National Intelligence Organization Report Revealed
**The National Intelligence Organization (MIT) has recently unveiled a previously classified intelligence report dating back to 1935. This document, now accessible on their official website, sheds light on the covert activities of Times Correspondent Walter Collins, revealing that he was operating under the auspices of the Organization. The report indicates that Collins was instructed to use pseudonyms for prominent Turkish figures, substituting Robertson for Atatürk, Smith for İsmet İnönü, and Brown for Marshal Fevzi.**
The report, dated February 2, 1935, details Collins’ activities upon returning to Istanbul on January 28 of the same year. He engaged with Mr. Nurettin, a local newspaper reporter, who was tasked with serving as Collins’ correspondent in Ankara. Notably, the directives given to Nurettin included insights into the telegrams Collins was expected to send, as well as the instructions he would receive from him.
In his initial briefing, Nurettin was explicitly instructed to adopt the aforementioned pseudonyms when referencing key political figures. The report highlights that Canut would step in to assist Collins during his absences, ensuring that communications remained uninterrupted. Additionally, Collins indicated that his base of operations was the Fındıklı-Exelsior Hotel, underscoring the logistical aspects of his reporting.
MIT’s release of this report not only reveals the intricate web of communication between Collins and his contacts in Ankara but also illustrates the lengths to which intelligence organizations may go to influence and control narratives during tumultuous times. This historical document opens a window into the past, allowing us to understand the dynamics of media and intelligence in the early 20th century.
As the public engages with this newly revealed information, it provokes questions about the role of foreign correspondents in international politics and the ethical implications of their work. The revelations surrounding Collins challenge us to reconsider the integrity of reporting and the impact of state influence on journalistic practices.
